Last night, as many of you know, 60 minutes aired an expose on a few of the issues facing the cemetery and funeral profession. Considering the small allotment of time, they did a fairly adequate job of portraying some of the landmark cases/issues facing this industry. They covered Chicago, Florida and California and interviewed a couple of industry persons, one who was proclaimed to be a profession spokesman and one proclaims himself to be an industry watchdog.
Today, I have watched the varying accounts/opinions of that news article, and find a couple of things of concern. 1. Mr. Elvig who considers himself the industry spokesman, stated these problems are not widespread and the very fact that our profession performs 6,500 burials daily doesn’t make these issues reach to the level of widespread or common. I chose to comment on those assertions, that making statements of this nature come across arrogant and uncaring to those families, communities, and their associates, who have been impacted by the incidents portrayed in the article. 2. He cited tougher regulation in Illinois, stemming from the Burr Oak Scandal, which couldn’t be further from reality. Stricter rules were adopted, only to be pulled and watered down within months of enactment. Someone who considers themselves an industry spokesman should know what is happening in this ever changing environment. Mr. Elvig is also consulting with the Portland Metro Cemetery Program in Oregon where remains have been found in the dirt piles, so for him to come across as this being no big deal is a little alarming to me.
Then there were the assertions by Joshua Slocum, the self proclaimed watchdog to the industry. His comments make it sound like the whole profession is corrupt, and he has made many comments of this nature in the past. I take exception to his claims, as affronts to the many honorable and ethical professionals who have chosen this as their careers. Where there are also many who do not belong in this industry, being willing to lump the black eye among all professionals will only further the alienation of his group from the profession, and the constant calling for further federal regulation is irresponsible considering the existing federal regulation is hardly respectable. Every state has their own sets of statutes regulating the death care profession, both cemetery and funeral, and it is a simple answer if only those states would choose to enforce the statutes they already have in place. The feds cannot regulate themselves, let alone another profession. It’s time for these state regulatory agencies to start doing their jobs, and for the states to properly fund those agencies so they can. It is so easy to find issues with any profession, but it takes more to discover solutions and not just try to tear a group down.
Today, I read the response from the counsel from ICCFA, and there were really no surprises there, except his comment that CBS failed to relate those involved in Burr Oak have been prosecuted and imprisoned. That too, is not quite accurate. One of the defendants has been prosecuted and imprisoned, three have been indicted and await prosecution. The glaring omission to me in his response is the lack of distancing between SCI and the rest of the industry his group represent. I can bet, based on calls I received today, nobody wants to share the black eye this report caused. An industry association should consider the greater good of their group. I did, however appreciate his final comment that just one problem of this nature is one too many, and his understanding of the limitations of full disclosure in a limited timeslot.
And finally, I was terribly disappointed in the complete lack of reporting on the problems over the past few years at Arlington National Cemetery and the Veterans Administration Cemeteries. That would have leveled the playing field and furthered my stance against further federal regulations to the private sector. They can’t regulate their own cemeteries, so what qualifies them to regulate ours?